Design Classics: unequivocal, tangible, iconic?

January 20, 2009

Concorde (1976) is the youngest of Royal Mail’s new Design Classics special stamps, and a reminder of how far design has stretched in the last thirty years. More recently London’s design community witnessed an ugly fissure in two incidents that provoked unprecedented media debate about the meaning of design. Remember the angry resignation of James Dyson (inventor of the bagless, dual-cyclone vacuum cleaner) as the Design Museum’s Chair of Trustees? An exhibition about the pioneering mid-century styling maven Constance Spry – a Martha Stewart before her time but all too easily dismissed as a flower-arranger – was the final straw for those who believed a design musuem should narrowly demonstrate the power of engineering wed to manufacturing technology. Then Design Museum jury’s decision to award the title of Designer of the Year to Hilary Cottam; not herself a designer like her fellow candidates, but a social activist passionate about using “design thinking” to address deeply entrenched dysfunction in public services; particularly prisons, schools and health services.

 

All of this begged us to ask: what is design anyway? In the 20th century chairs were really important touchstones of future thinking; as were labour-saving domestic devices, housing solutions for everyone and, later, portable electronics. But these two incidents were at the centre of a new discourse in which the meaning of design in our post-modernist, post-industrial world has irretrievably expanded. The image is recognised to be as significant as the artefact; the value of the service is known often to outstrip that of the goods; the built environment is a metaphysical concept full of hidden forces; regeneration finds more favour than the new; and design – for so many and for so long synonymous with the sleazy adjectival tag “designer-” – regains some of its more abstract and divine original significance.

 

Three of these classics – Alec Issigionis’s Mini, Mary Quant’s mini-skirt and Robin Day’s Polypropylene chair – were designed by the RSA’s own Royal Designers; themselves continuously exercised in defining “sustained excellence in design” as the uses and sightings of design proliferate around us.  

 

It’s sobering for design insiders to look at the Design Classics selection, for while we strive to determine the meaning of design today, these classics are unequivocal: tangible and iconic. The Classic most tractable in our modern, stretchy design-critical terms is Harry Beck’s London Underground map. Its metaphysical character is its virtue; almost anyone over the age of about seven can see that it’s a schematic rather than literal representation of geographical reality. In our interactive times, when the Web gives us access to information that is infinitely deep and wide, the Underground map is eternally modern.

About these ads

2 Responses to “Design Classics: unequivocal, tangible, iconic?”

  1. Mike Dempsey Says:

    In an era where the parameters of the word ‘designer’ are being ever stretched – designer babies, drugs, foods etc, etc. It is heartening to see a celebration of true pioneers of the discipline, via the issue of the ‘British Design Classics’ Royal Mail stamps. The contribution that these individuals have made to society should never be under estimated, be it on a practical level or simply on aesthetic grounds. Both have their place in helping to make our world a better and more imaginative place.


  2. Whilst these are indeed classics, I find it a rather sad collection for two reasons.

    Firstly, it is sad that nothing newer than Concorde is included in the collection. Does this mean that no real classics have been designed in the UK for more than 30 years?

    Secondly, if these designs really are so classic, how come so few of them are still in use, let alone still in production? The point is they were classic, now they’re history. There is a place for nostalgia, and these are definitely hitting all of the nostalgia buttons, recalling a time when Britain was ‘great’ presumably, but surely there is also a place for something just a little more contemporary?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: